A Money Coach in Canada

Follow & Subscribe

I’m more than a little choked at the reasons both NPA and the media are surmising I – and 67,598 of my fellow vancouverites – voted for Gregor/Vision/COPE.

The reasons cited by NPA and the media are precisely illustrative of the fact that They Don’t Get It and seem genuinely at a loss as to why the NPA might be swept out.

1.  They Dissed Us: Ladner himself, on SHAW TV live coverage, commented to the effect that those of us (67,599 of us) voted on superficialities … implying at one point, as superficially as Robertson’s good looks.  Similarly De Genova commented:  “Gregor Roberson? Nice guy, looks good, speaks well. Has zero experience, zero knowledge to find his way around town,” De Genova said.   Last, Mayencourt dissed all of us by a comment on camera to the effect that the NPA would start work the next morning so that next election we’d elect a decent (or a word to that effect) council – implying our newly elected one is not decent.

This kind of naive, narcissistic incredulity that they could possibly, possibly be voted out of office – so much so that they accuse the electorate of voting based on superficialities – is precisely the attitude that got them the boot.

2.  Media think it’s about the scandal.  I’ve seen plenty of media speculation that the scandal played a role in the outcome.   It certainly wasn’t in my case:  It simply confirmed my opinion of the NPA – surreptitiously, egotistically, making back-room deals with big-business, possibly at the long-term expense of the average-joe-taxpayer (of which I’m one).

Here’s why I voted Vision, pure and simple:  they seem to give a damn about us citizens, in a way that the NPA just.plain.doesn’t.   Full stop.  

Readers:  If you voted for Vision, did the scandal play a role?  And do you think you voted for a similar reason as I did?

2447825721_4376799b80_m.jpgGregor:  Best wishes, congrats, and keep giving a damn.

Photo Credit:  Blackbird

About the Author


Imagine if Canadians were known for being all over their money. Engaged. Proactive. Getting out of debt. Savvy. Saving. Generous. Nancy wants to help. Nancy started her own journey with money over 15 years ago, and formed her company “Your Money by Design” in 2004 to help others along the same path. It’s not the usual financial advising/investment stuff. It’s about taking control of day-to-day finances –managing monthly cashflow effectively, spending appropriately, getting out of debt, saving. If you're ready to take control over your finances, pop by her business site, YourMoneybyDesign.com

4 Comments

  1. E

    I know you only asked for replies from people who voted for Vision — I did vote NPA and await the stoning — but I just wanted to point out that there appears to be a lot of evidence to support point #2. Ample evidence in exit polls & surveys suggest that undecided or apathetic voters were swayed to Vision because of the scandal.

    Those who were already decided Vision-voters were obviously not affected.

    [Reply]

    Nov 20, 2008
  2. Hi E – no stoning forthcoming – I do respect democracy and diverse opinion, for sure, which is why I am so upset that those of us who voted differently were subjected to such derisive comments.
    If you have any links re: scandal, I’d be really interested to see them.
    And I’m sincerely glad you, like anyone who did, voted, period, even if for a party I don’t agree with.

    [Reply]

    Nov 20, 2008
  3. What’s a little scary is characterizing this election along WASP/Other lines. I mean, in all honesty, I’m a WASP. “Gregor”??? Please. It’s racism, plain and simple.

    [Reply]

    Nov 25, 2008
  4. Just found your blog, Nancy, through Twitter, and couldn’t resist posting on this question: I would side with E (though our household did vote a mixed-slate of candidates, being truly non-partisan).

    Moreover, we feel NPA was the best choice for the exact reason you didn’t vote NPA: Vision tends to be “surreptitiously, egotistically, making back-room deals with [small]-business, possibly at the long-term expense of the average-joe-taxpayer.” By contrast, the Millennium deal — regardless of whether or not you agree with it — was done according to council rules. We weren’t reassured that Gregor didn’t seem to understand this.

    [Reply]

    Nov 26, 2008

Leave a Reply




CommentLuv badge